Scramble
The nomination of close-pal Harriet Miers seems has locked Bush into more pandering than normal for the conservatives who have staged something akin to an uprising against her nomination and pushed The Administration into role of apologist/"Trust Us" leadership reactivism for their base, all while still maintaining their cool status in the eyes of the opposition:
It was the third time since he picked Ms. Miers on Monday that the president has come to her defense. His remarks came as Senator Arlen Specter, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who presides over confirmation hearings, offered a blunt assessment that was yet another sign that the nominee faced an uphill battle on Capitol Hill. Though Mr. Specter called Ms. Miers "intellectually able," he said she had a "fair-sized job to do" to become fluent in the language of constitutional law, which will be essential for senators who want to examine her judicial philosophy in deciding whether to confirm her.
"She needs more than murder boards," Mr. Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania, said in an interview, referring to the mock question-and-answer sessions most nominees use to prepare for their confirmation hearings. "She needs a crash course in constitutional law."
The conservative uproar over Ms. Miers underscores how difficult it has been for Mr. Bush to pull his own party together as he faces a variety of problems on other fronts: his administration's response to Hurricane Katrina; a leak investigation involving his chief political adviser, Karl Rove; the indictment of Representative Tom DeLay of Texas, who was the House majority leader; and, most recently, the decision by a top Justice Department nominee to withdraw amid questions over his ties to a Republican lobbyist accused of fraud.
Only a week ago, Republicans were saying they looked forward to a new Supreme Court nominee because it would give them something to rally around, providing a welcome distraction from the Bush administration's problems. But the nomination of Ms. Miers only served to roil a party that is already divided over domestic matters like Social Security and how to pay to rebuild the Gulf Coast.
Now, having alienated his conservative backers, Mr. Bush must go forward on the Miers nomination alone, without the help of many of the advocates who led the charge for the last nominee, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.
Behind the scenes, Republican allies of the White House said they were trying to put together a public relations strategy to combat the mounting criticism over the Miers nomination. The effort, they said, would include administration officials, the Republican National Committee and conservative advocates who will carry onto television, talk radio and other forums the message that Ms. Miers, the White House counsel and a close confidante of the president, is a strong choice and that Mr. Bush will stand firmly behind her.
3 Comments:
if i were among the powerful elitist republican administration, it would be difficult to ignore the spreading discontentment of the republican base who, having elected Bush into power, now doubt his ability to respond in a crisis following Hurricane Katrina. It would be hard to ignore the spiraling downward numbers of support and the spiraling rising numbers of interest in cronyism, corruption and depressing incompetence. And if i wanted a republican to be in power in 2008, i would cut my losses now and find the first minor reason to rally against the president in a way that did not implicate the entire republican party. Something that had nothing to do with congress. Something that was unrelated to the entire federal administration and could easily be blamed on the president, and only the president. Say, a supreme court nominee, as opposed to a gigantic inability to act in a disaster that erradicated an entire American City. And then, i would really start hailing John McCain as an amazing and moral republican leader. Watch out, guys, the conservative outcry blogs on Meiers started something like an hour or two before Bushy announced her nomination, and were apparently at incredible levels of chatter. Even Ms. Coulter is making disparaging remarks.
It's true- but what also is going on here is Republican factionalism: they are shearing off one after another, trying to rebuild those core alliances. But you point out such a vital fact: they realize that they stand to lose a lot of power if they don't straighten themselves up. In NJ, all the attack ads for the republican gov. candidate pin him as "George Bush's candidate. But is he yours?" An interesting attack claim from Democrats, but with some language shifts, it could easily become a mantra for a new-Republican group of mutinizing up-and-comers who seek to overtake leadership positions on all fronts- Delay/Blunt, Frist, El Presidente...
Interesting times. And you're damn right- they're trying to figure out who is next. I don't think they counted on this Admin becoming potentially lame-duck so early; and they'll be scrambling to keep their numbers high.
We [by that, America] can only be so lucky for McCain to come out of this fracas on top.
The republicans are mobilizing so quickly to put the blame on specific people within the their own party so as to merely point their fingers (where we've already been told to look) when it comes time to retain their power. I just think that the democrats need to be just as quick, united and single-focused. They need to reiterate the actual truth, which is that the republicans have failed in their attempt at governance. Failed. Our Government really should be about the People. The past five years have been an exercise in how it isn't.
Post a Comment
<< Home