Hinderaker
From Is That Legal, we have John Hinderaker thru-the-years:
asd
John Hinderaker, yesterday:There is one core difference between the Clinton scandals as Mr. Hinderaker saw them then and the Plame Affair as we must understand them now. The Clinton affairs was not about "sex, which was consequential to the perjury," where the Plame Affair is whole heartedly about Purjury- everything done both to Plame and Wilson and to the American people is a form of Purjury on the part of The Administration- they have consistently, intently, and maliciously lied to the American people and to the global community. Every time they spoke about the Iraq war in the run-up has been a form of purjury, an intentional misleading attempt to promote thier own agenda.
Tomorrow may bring indictments of Karl Rove and Scooter Libby on charges that can charitably be described as trivial. Tonight, one of our readers urged us to link to President Bush's great speech to the Joint Armed Forces Officers' Wives' group rather than being distracted by the minutiae of the day. Good suggestion.
John Hinderaker, December 17, 1998:
"Like many others, we have been frustrated by the apparent inability of much of the American public to take the Clinton scandals seriously. "It's not about sex," we have patiently repeated to our benighted friends. "It's about perjury. It's about obstruction of justice. The sex is only incidental. At most it was the motive for the crimes. You wouldn't think murder was unimportant just because the motive for the murder was sex, would you?" So goes our argument."
asd
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home