Best Available Science

A White House official edited government reports in ways that played down links between global warming and emissions, the New York Times reported.

Philip Cooney removed or adjusted descriptions of climate research that had already been approved by government scientists, the newspaper said.

The White House denied Mr Cooney, a former oil industry advocate, watered down the reports. It said the changes were part of a normal inter-agency review process. The reports were "based on the best available science", spokesman Scott McClellan said.

Mr Cooney is chief of staff for the White House Council on Environmental Quality, which helps devise and promote the administration's policies on environmental issues.

The administration of President George W Bush has consistently questioned the need for quick action on climate change, and the US has refused to ratify the Kyoto Protocol aimed at cutting down greenhouse gas emissions.

Before working at the White House, Mr Cooney was a lobbyist at the American Petroleum Institute, the largest oil industry trade group. He is a lawyer by training, with no scientific background.

The New York Times said he made dozens of changes to reports issued in 2002 and 2003, and many appeared in final versions of major administration climate reports.

Technically, I suppose McClellan is to some degree correct: It is, after all, only "based" on the best science. It is the similar to a bad novel that has been written that is "based" on a movie. Although I also wonder if it is the best science out there, or merely that science which seems to come closest to the ability to fudge it for your political ideology.

Once again, this ties in to The Administration's no-qualms-about-it attitude about manipulating any kind of information for their own political gain, and get away with it.